John Clark v. Vernon Russell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998923888]. Mailed to: J. Clark, G. Pittman. [12-1489]

Appeal: 12-1489

Doc: 17

Filed: 08/24/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1489

JOHN R. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERNON RUSSELL; LAW FIRM OF PLUMMER, BELO & RUSSELL, PA;
FOOTLOCKER, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA)

Submitted:

August 22, 2012

Decided

August 24, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John R. Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Paul Booth, III,
Gabrielle Amber Pittman, SHARPLESS & STAVOLA, PA, Greensboro,
North Carolina; Kerry Anne Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT,
DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1489

Doc: 17

Filed: 08/24/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John
accepting

the

R.

Clark

appeals

recommendation

of

dismissing his civil action.
find

no

reversible

error.

the

district

the

magistrate

order

judge

and

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.
1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA

court’s

(M.D.N.C.

Mar.

26,

we

affirm

for

the

Clark v. Russell, No.
2012).

We

dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2