Dennis Croft v. City of Roanoke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00277-GEC-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999028817].. [12-1513]

Appeal: 12-1513

Doc: 23

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1513

DENNIS CROFT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00277-GEC-RSB)

Submitted:

December 27, 2012

Decided:

January 24, 2013

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John M. Loeschen, JOHN M. LOESCHEN LAW OFFICES, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant.
Timothy Ross Spencer, OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1513

Doc: 23

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dennis

Croft,

a

former

captain

with

the

City

of

Roanoke Fire/EMS Department, appeals the district court’s order
granting the City of Roanoke’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissing

his

employment

discrimination

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district
court in its memorandum opinion.

See Croft v. City of Roanoke,

Va., No. 7:11-cv-00277-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2012).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2