Milton Thorpe v. Mechanicsville Concrete, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999011636-2] Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00797-JRS-DJN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999080754]. Mailed to: Thorpe. [12-1535]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1535 Doc: 19 Filed: 04/05/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1535 MILTON D. THORPE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MECHANICSVILLE CONCRETE, LLC, d/b/a Powhatan Ready Mix, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00797-JRS-DJN) Submitted: March 18, 2013 Decided: April 5, 2013 Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton D. Thorpe, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn Forgrieve Jacob, James Nelson Wilkinson, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1535 Doc: 19 Filed: 04/05/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Milton D. Thorpe appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in his civil action under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27, Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981a (2006). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Thorpe v. Mechanicsville Concrete, LLC, No. 3:10-cv-00797-JRSDJN (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2012). We deny Thorpe’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?