Cynthia Williamson v. Carolina Power & Light Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00258-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998973126]. [12-1545]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1545 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/02/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1545 CYNTHIA C. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a Progress Carolinas, Inc., a/k/a Progress Energy, Inc., Energy Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00258-BO) Submitted: October 1, 2012 Decided: November 2, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sandra J. Polin, LAW OFFICE OF SANDRA J. POLIN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. J. Travis Hockaday, Zebulon D. Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1545 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/02/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 C. appeals PER CURIAM: Cynthia Williamson the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2012). the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carolina Power Mar. 28, 2012). facts and materials legal before & Light We Co., No. dispense with 5:10-cv-00258-BO oral argument contentions are adequately the and argument court Williamson v. (E.D.N.C. because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?