Cynthia Williamson v. Carolina Power & Light Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00258-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998973126]. [12-1545]
Appeal: 12-1545
Doc: 19
Filed: 11/02/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1545
CYNTHIA C. WILLIAMSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a Progress
Carolinas, Inc., a/k/a Progress Energy, Inc.,
Energy
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00258-BO)
Submitted:
October 1, 2012
Decided:
November 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra J. Polin, LAW OFFICE OF SANDRA J. POLIN, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
J. Travis Hockaday, Zebulon D.
Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN,
L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1545
Doc: 19
Filed: 11/02/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
C.
appeals
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia
Williamson
the
district
court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her
action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2012).
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Carolina
Power
Mar. 28,
2012).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
&
Light
We
Co.,
No.
dispense
with
5:10-cv-00258-BO
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
Williamson v.
(E.D.N.C.
because
presented
would
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?