Thomas Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998858026-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987353]. Mailed to: Thomas Budnick. [12-1618]
Appeal: 12-1618
Doc: 20
Filed: 11/26/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1618
THOMAS P. BUDNICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC., parent of RMS Titanic, Inc., her
tackle,
armament,
apparel,
appurtenances,
cargo
and
property within the abandoned vessel admiralty placer
mining claim located about 414332 north latitude and 495649
west longitude, believed to be the RMS Titanic, in rem,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM)
Submitted:
November 20, 2012
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided: November 26, 2012
and
SHEDD
and
FLOYD,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas P. Budnick, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Quinn Ashcroft, Robert
W. McFarland, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1618
Doc: 20
Filed: 11/26/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas P. Budnick appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Budnick v. Premier
Exhibitions, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 10,
2012).
We
pauperis.
legal
before
grant
application
to
proceed
in
forma
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
Budnick’s
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?