Thomas Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998858026-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987353]. Mailed to: Thomas Budnick. [12-1618]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1618 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/26/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1618 THOMAS P. BUDNICK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC., parent of RMS Titanic, Inc., her tackle, armament, apparel, appurtenances, cargo and property within the abandoned vessel admiralty placer mining claim located about 414332 north latitude and 495649 west longitude, believed to be the RMS Titanic, in rem, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: November 26, 2012 and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. Budnick, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Quinn Ashcroft, Robert W. McFarland, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1618 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/26/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas P. Budnick appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Budnick v. Premier Exhibitions, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00035-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2012). We pauperis. legal before grant application to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the Budnick’s court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?