Roy M. Terry, Jr. v. Thaddeus William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [998932890-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00154-REP,3:11-cv-00868-REP,09-36121-KRH,10-03117-KRH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998949231]. Mailed to: Michele B. Williams, Thaddeus D. Williams. [12-1663]

Appeal: 12-1663

Doc: 25

Filed: 10/01/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1663

In re:

THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS,
Debtor

----------------------------------SANDRA S. SPAIN,
CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Sandra

S.

Spain

Sprouse;

TREADEGAR

Plaintiffs,
v.
THADDEUS D. WILLIAMS; MICHELE B. WILLIAMS,
Defendants – Appellants,
v.
ROY M. TERRY, JR.,
Construction, LLC,

Liquidating

Trustee

for

Treadegar

Movant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge.
(3:12-cv-00154-REP; 3:11-cv-00868-REP; 0936121-KRH; 10-03117-KRH)

Submitted:

September 27, 2012

Decided:

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

October 1, 2012

Appeal: 12-1663

Doc: 25

Filed: 10/01/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddeus D. and Michele B. Williams, Appellants Pro Se.
John
Craig Smith, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-1663

Doc: 25

Filed: 10/01/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Thaddeus D. Williams and Michele B. Williams appeal
from

the

district

court’s

order

finding

that

they

lacked

standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order approving a
settlement

agreement.

Because

the

terms

of

the

settlement

agreement have been consummated, this appeal is moot.

See In re

Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir. 1990) (“Absent a
stay, the court must dismiss a pending appeal as moot because
the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it would
have

determined

Accordingly,

we

grant Roy Terry’s motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal.

We

dispense

with

the

oral

issues

differently.”).

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3