Irma Williams v. David Sabo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998976734].. [12-1689]
Appeal: 12-1689
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/07/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1689
IRMA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID SABO; CYNTHIA BREYFOGLE; MARYANN CURL; CAROLE RIVERS;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH)
Submitted:
November 2, 2012
Decided:
November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George W. Saenger, ADAMS, HENDON, CARSON, CROW & SAENGER, PA,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Anne M. Tompkins,
United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States
Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1689
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/07/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Irma
Williams
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to substitute the
United States as the party Defendant and dismissing her civil
action.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(W.D.N.C.
Apr.
See Williams v. Sabo, No. 1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH
25,
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?