Helen Newman v. General Services Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying proceed in forma pauperis Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00783-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998937322]. Mailed to: Helen C. Newman Maria A. Newman. [12-1707]

Appeal: 12-1707

Doc: 16

Filed: 09/13/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1707

HELEN C. NEWMAN,
U.S. ARMY,

PRIVATE

INVESTIGATOR;

MARIA

A.

NEWMAN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00783-REP)

Submitted:

September 11, 2012

Decided:

September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helen C. Newman, Maria A. Newman, Appellants Pro Se.
Julie
Smith Palmer, Stanley Paul Wellman, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN &
WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1707

Doc: 16

Filed: 09/13/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Helen

C.

Newman

and

Maria

A.

Newman

appeal

the

district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.
find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court.

Newman v. Gen. Servs. Corp., No. 3:11-

cv-00783-REP (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2