Patricia Plummer v. Michael Astrue
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00006-RLV-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975536].. [12-1719]
Appeal: 12-1719
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1719
PATRICIA G. PLUMMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00006-RLV-DSC)
Submitted:
October 31, 2012
Decided:
November 6, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel S. Johnson, North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Charlotte,
North Carolina, Luis Pere, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Social Security Administration, Boston, Massachusetts,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1719
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia G. Plummer appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the
Commissioner
of
Social
Security’s
disability insurance benefits.
deny
benefits
evidence
and
if
the
the
to
deny
Plummer
We must uphold the decision to
decision
correct
decision
law
is
was
supported
applied.
by
substantial
See
42
U.S.C.
§ 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th
Cir.
2005)
parties’
(per
briefs,
curiam).
We
administrative
have
thoroughly
record,
and
reviewed
the
the
materials
submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm.
See Plummer v. Astrue, No. 5:11-cv-
00006-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2012).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?