Christopher Buckner v. UPS
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00411-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987486]. Mailed to: Christopher Buckner. [12-1733]
Appeal: 12-1733
Doc: 17
Filed: 11/26/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1733
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00411-BR)
Submitted:
November 20, 2012
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided: November 26, 2012
and
SHEDD
and
FLOYD,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Eugene Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn G. Patton,
ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1733
Doc: 17
Filed: 11/26/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher
Eugene
Buckner
appeals
the
magistrate
judge’s and the district court’s various pretrial orders and the
district
court’s
final
order
denying
relief
on
Buckner’s
complaint alleging violations of the National Labor Relations
Act (“NLRA”), the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act (“NCWHA”),
the
Labor
Management
Standards
Act
Relations
(“FLSA”),
and
administrative code sections.
find
no
reversible
Act
error.
(“LMRA”),
additional
the
Fair
Labor
federal
and
state
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Buckner v. United Parcel
Serv., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00411-BR (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2010; Jan.
27, 2011; Mar. 24, 2011; July 19, 2011; Dec. 22, 2011; Feb. 23,
2012;
Apr.
4,
2012;
May
7,
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?