Christopher Buckner v. UPS

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00411-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987486]. Mailed to: Christopher Buckner. [12-1733]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1733 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/26/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1733 CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BUCKNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00411-BR) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: November 26, 2012 and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Eugene Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn G. Patton, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1733 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/26/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the magistrate judge’s and the district court’s various pretrial orders and the district court’s final order denying relief on Buckner’s complaint alleging violations of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act (“NCWHA”), the Labor Management Standards Act Relations (“FLSA”), and administrative code sections. find no reversible Act error. (“LMRA”), additional the Fair Labor federal and state We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00411-BR (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2010; Jan. 27, 2011; Mar. 24, 2011; July 19, 2011; Dec. 22, 2011; Feb. 23, 2012; Apr. 4, 2012; May 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?