Tamorah Chapman v. Timothy Geithner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998884949-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999030175]. Mailed to: Tamorah Chapman. [12-1803]
Appeal: 12-1803
Doc: 14
Filed: 01/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1803
TAMORAH L. CHAPMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ)
Submitted:
November 30, 2012
Decided:
January 25, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tamorah L. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se.
Julie Ann Edelstein,
Bernard
G.
Kim,
OFFICE
OF
THE
UNITED
STATES
ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-1803
Doc: 14
Filed: 01/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tamorah L. Chapman, a former employee of the Internal
Revenue Service, appeals the district court’s order granting the
Secretary
of
the
Treasury’s
motions
for
judgment
on
the
pleadings and summary judgment, and dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, although we grant leave for
Chapman to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the
judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its
memorandum opinion.
See Chapman v. Geithner, No. 1:11-cv-01016-
GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2012 & entered May 1, 2012).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?