Tamorah Chapman v. Timothy Geithner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998884949-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999030175]. Mailed to: Tamorah Chapman. [12-1803]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1803 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1803 TAMORAH L. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01016-GBL-TRJ) Submitted: November 30, 2012 Decided: January 25, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tamorah L. Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1803 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tamorah L. Chapman, a former employee of the Internal Revenue Service, appeals the district court’s order granting the Secretary of the Treasury’s motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment, and dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, although we grant leave for Chapman to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. See Chapman v. Geithner, No. 1:11-cv-01016- GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2012 & entered May 1, 2012). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?