Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dept

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cv-00092-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987469]. Mailed to: appellants. [12-1831]

Appeal: 12-1831

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/26/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1831

RONNIE WAYNE CRADDOCK; SHERRIE DENISE HAWKINS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BEAUFORT
COUNTY
SHERIFFS
DEPARTMENT;
BEAUFORT
COUNTY
SHERIFFS OFFICE; SHERIFF ALAN JORDAN; DEPUTY SHERIFF JEREMY
WALLACE; DEPUTY SHERIFF CHARLES ROSE; DEPUTY SHERIFF NINA
SHOAF; DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES STALLINGS; DEPUTY SHERIFF KEITH
OWENS; DEPUTY SHERIFF C. R. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cv-00092-D)

Submitted:

November 20, 2012

Before TRAXLER,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided: November 26, 2012

and

SHEDD

and

FLOYD,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Wayne Craddock, Sherrie Denise Hawkins, Appellants Pro
Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1831

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/26/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ronnie

Wayne

Craddock

and

Sherrie

Denise

Hawkins

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
find

no

reasons

reversible
stated

by

error.
the

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

district

court.

we

affirm

Craddock

v.

for

the

Beaufort

Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26,
2011).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2