Lacey S. Mitchell v. Commissioner, Social Security

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00723-BPG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998987355]. Mailed to: Lacey S. Mitchell. [12-1860]

Appeal: 12-1860

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/26/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1860

LACEY S. MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge.
(1:11-cv-00723-BPG)

Submitted:

November 20, 2012

Before TRAXLER,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided: November 26, 2012

and

SHEDD

and

FLOYD,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacey S. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Alex Gordon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1860

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/26/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lacey S. Mitchell appeals the magistrate judge’s order
affirming
benefits. *

the

Commissioner’s

denial

of

disability

insurance

We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the

decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct
law was applied.

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v.

Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam).
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge.

Mitchell v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec., No. 1:11-cv-00723-BPG (D.

Md. June 14, 2012).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2006).

2