Michelle Pharr v. Rajnish Jain

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00007-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999026091]. Mailed to: Michelle Pharr. [12-1941]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-1941 Doc: 23 Filed: 01/22/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1941 MICHELLE D. PHARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAJNISH K. JAIN; AKHIL JAIN; RAJNISH K. JAIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST 99-2 TRUSTEE AKHIL JAIN; JAIN AND ASSOCIATES, L.P.; RAJ S. RAHIL; THE MARIAPPA 2005 REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 11/10/2005 TRUSTEES SUDESH MARIAPPA AND EIKO HIRABAYASHI; JRS PARTNERS, LLC; SUFFOLK LODGING PARTNERS, LLC; TOWN CENTER HOSPITALITY, LLC; FIRST LODGING PARTNERS, LLC; LANDMARK HOTEL GROUP, LLC; PENINSULA HOSPITALITY, LLC; YORKTOWN LODGING PARTNERS, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00007-BO) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michelle D. Pharr, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Alvin Bryant, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-1941 Doc: 23 Filed: 01/22/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michelle D. Pharr appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion matter jurisdiction. reversible error. by the district (E.D.N.C. July to dismiss for lack of subject We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. 23, Pharr 2012). We v. Jain, dispense No. 2:12-cv-00007-BO with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?