US v. Cynthia Allen-William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion for stay pending appeal [998950855-2]. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01001-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999004908]. Mailed to: Cynthia Allen-Williams. [12-1983]

Appeal: 12-1983

Doc: 22

Filed: 12/18/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1983

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, "PHEAA",
Third Party Defendant – Appellee,
v.
CYNTHIA Y. ALLEN-WILLIAMS, D.D.S.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01001-JFM)

Submitted:

November 6, 2012

Decided:

December 18, 2012

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cynthia Y. Allen-Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Frank
Corcoran, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland;
William D. Day, GILL, SIPPEL & GALLAGHER, Rockville, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-1983

Doc: 22

Filed: 12/18/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Cynthia

Y.

Allen-Williams,

D.D.S.,

appeals

from

the

district court’s memorandum and order entering judgment in favor
of the United States in its action to recover amounts due on
promissory

notes

education

loans

Pennsylvania
judgment

executed

on

thoroughly

and

Higher

in

granting

the

Education

Allen-Williams’
reviewed

connection

the

with

Third-Party

Assistance

third-party

record

and

the

on

the

reasoning

of

the

district

health

Defendant,

Agency,

complaint.

memorandum and discern no reversible error.
affirm

two

summary
We

district

have

court’s

Accordingly, we

court.

See

United

States v. Allen-Williams, No. 8:11-cv-01001-JFM (D. Md. June 11
& June 21, 2012).

We deny as moot Allen-Williams’ motion to

stay execution of the money judgment entered against her.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2