Cadence Bank NA v. Horry Properties, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-02717-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999097892].. [12-2008]

Appeal: 12-2008

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/30/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2008

CADENCE BANK NA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HORRY PROPERTIES, LLC, a South Carolina Limited Liability
Company; M&M BUILDERS, LLC OF OD, a South Carolina Limited
Liability Company; ARTHUR F. MCLEAN, JR.,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK; HORRY COUNTY STATE BANK,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:10-cv-02717-RBH)

Submitted:

April 25, 2013

Decided:

April 30, 2013

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis D. Nettles, FOLKENS LAW FIRM P.A., Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellants.
J. Thomas McBratney, III, MCBRATNEY
LAW FIRM, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Appeal: 12-2008

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/30/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-2008

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/30/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Horry Properties, LLC, M&M Builders, LLC of OD, and
Arthur

F.

McLean,

Jr.,

appeal

the

district

court’s

orders

setting aside transfers of certain real property and associated
leases as fraudulent conveyances and denying their motion to
alter or amend the judgment.

We have reviewed the district

court’s thorough opinions, as well as the parties’ briefs and
the record included on appeal, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Cadence Bank NA v. Horry Prop., LLC, 4:10-cv-02717-RBH

(D.S.C. April 3, 2012; July 17, 2012).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3