Delta Walsh v. Dewain Mackey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00321-MR-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998981953]. Mailed to: Delta Walsh. [12-2024]
Appeal: 12-2024
Doc: 26
Filed: 11/15/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2024
DELTA WALSH, Individually, and on behalf
children, to-wit; R.M.; R.W.; W.W.; R.K.,
of
her
minor
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DEWAIN MACKEY, and Madison County Planning/Zoning Board, in
his official capacity as Vice-Chairman; MADISON COUNTY
PLANNING
BOARD;
MACKEY
FARMS;
MADISON
COUNTY
SCHOOL
DISTRICT; KATHY PARKER MACKEY, and Mackey Farm and Madison
County School District, in her individual and professional
capacities; KATHY RAY, in her individual capacity and in her
official capacity as Paralegal for the Twenty-Fourth
Prosecutorial District; GERALD WILSON, in his individual
capacity, and in his official capacity as Chief District
Attorney for the Twenty-Fourth Prosecutorial District;
ALEXANDER LYERLY, in his individual capacity, and in his
official as Chief District Court Judge for the Twenty-Fourth
Judicial District; SAMUEL E. PARKER, in his individual
capacity, and in his official capacity as Madison County
Magistrate; RONALD WILCOX, and the Madison County School
District,
in
his
individual
capacity,
and
in
his
professional capacity as Superintendent for Madison County
School District; ROBERT DAVIDSON, and Madison County Animal
Control, in his individual capacity, and in his official
capacity as former Director for Madison County Animal
Control; MADISON COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL; SAM LUNSFORD, and
Madison County Animal Control, in his individual capacity,
and in his official capacity as Director for Madison County
Animal Control; JAMES HARWOOD, and Madison County Sheriff’s
Department, in his individual capacity, and in his official
capacity as Madison County Sheriff; MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT; GEORGE COLE, in his individual capacity, and in
his official capacity as (former) Detective for the Madison
County Sheriff’s Department; JOHN LEDFORD, and Madison
County Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity, and
in his official capacity as (former) Madison County Sheriff;
Appeal: 12-2024
Doc: 26
Filed: 11/15/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
LAMONA BANKS LEDFORD, in her individual capacity, and in her
professional capacity as owner/operator of Scott Banks
Trucking Company; JOHN DOES, as yet unknown and others
unnamed; DEWAIN MACKEY, and Mackey Farm and Madison County
School
District,
in
his
individual
and
professional
capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JANE DOES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00321-MR-DCK)
Submitted:
November 13, 2012
Decided: November 15, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Delta Walsh, Appellant Pro Se.
Larry Leake, LEAKE & SCOTT,
Asheville, North Carolina; Andrew B. Parker, LONG, PARKER &
WARREN, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina; Brian David Elston,
Karl Dean Shatley, II, CAMPBELL SHATLEY, PLLC, Asheville, North
Carolina; David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney
General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-2024
Doc: 26
Filed: 11/15/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Delta Walsh seeks to appeal the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and granting the
motions to dismiss certain Defendants with prejudice, denying
the motion to dismiss certain Defendants without prejudice, and
granting
Walsh
leave
to
file
a
second
amended
complaint
(excluding the Defendants dismissed with prejudice) or voluntary
dismissal within twenty days of the entry of the order. *
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
3, 2012).
before
the
reasons
stated
by
Accordingly,
the
district
Walsh v. Mackey, No. 1:11-cv-00321-MR-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug.
court.
legal
for
We have
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Walsh’s appeal from this order was interlocutory when
filed.
The district court’s subsequent entry of a final
judgment permits review of the order under the doctrine of
cumulative finality.
In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-89 (4th
Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Computer
Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir. 1992).
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?