Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01364-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999028591]. Mailed to: Cox. [12-2134]

Appeal: 12-2134

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2134

THOMAS R. COX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KELLY PULTZ,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
George Levi Russell, III, District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01364-GLR)

Submitted:

January 22, 2013

Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas R. Cox, Appellant Pro Se.
Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip E.
Culpepper, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis,
Maryland; Morgan William Fisher, LAWRENCE & FISHER PLLC,
Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-2134

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Thomas

R.

Cox

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against
the

State

of

Maryland

and

Anne

Arundel

defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz.
record and find no reversible error.

County,

Accordingly, we affirm for
Cox v. Maryland, No.

1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 10, 2012).
argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

his

We have reviewed the

the reasons stated by the district court.

oral

and

and

materials

We dispense with

legal

contentions

are

before

this

and

court

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2