Percy Clay v. P. Sharp

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00891-TDS-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999053328]. Mailed to: Clays. [12-2215]

Appeal: 12-2215

Doc: 12

Filed: 02/28/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2215

PERCY LEE CLAY; DIANE CLAY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
P. TREVOR SHARP, Individually, and in his capacity as
Magistrate, U.S. District Court Middle District, North
Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00891-TDS-LPA)

Submitted:

February 26, 2013

Decided:

February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy Lee Clay, Diane Clay, Appellants
Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Virginia, for Appellee.

Pro Se.
ATTORNEY,

Kartic
Roanoke,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-2215

Doc: 12

Filed: 02/28/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Percy

Lee

Clay

and

Diane

Clay

appeal

the

district

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
dismissing their civil action.
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.
1:10-cv-00891-TDS-LPA

(M.D.N.C.

dispense

with

because

contentions

are

argument

adequately

presented

affirm

for

the

See Clay v. P. Trevor

Sharp,

oral

we

in

July
the
the

3,

2012).

We

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2