Nelson Alvarez v. United States Dept of Treasury

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00175-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999076794]. Mailed to: Nelson Alvarez. [12-2242]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2242 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/01/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2242 NELSON RIVAS ALVAREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00175-IMK-JSK) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nelson Rivas Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Jonathan S. Cohen, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-2242 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/01/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Nelson Rivas Alvarez appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his civil complaint filed pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (West 2007 & Supp. 2012), and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2012). find no reversible error. court’s judgment. No. with contentions are Accordingly, we affirm the district Alvarez v. United States Dep’t of Treasury, 1:10-cv-00175-IMK-JSK dispense We have reviewed the record and oral (N.D.W. argument adequately Va. because presented in Aug. 24, 2012). the facts and legal materials before the We this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?