Kate Uwasomba v. Clyde Jett
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999008327-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00213-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Kate Uwasomba. [12-2253]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KATE I. UWASOMBA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
JUDITH UWASOMBA; SARAH UWASOMBA,
CLYDE D. JETT, in individual and official capacity; CENTRAL
TRANSPORT INCORPORATED; DOUGLAS A. LINES, PC, attorney;
DONALDSON & BLACK INCORPORATION; ARONBERG GOLDGEHN &
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
February 21, 2013
Before AGEE and
Decided: February 25, 2013
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kate I. Uwasomba, Appellant Pro Se.
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN &
Cynthia Lee Santoni,
DICKER, LLP, McLean,
Pg: 2 of 3
Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, HERBERT & SATTERWHITE PC,
Richmond, Virginia; Annemarie DiNardo Cleary, Douglas P. Rucker,
Jr., SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Kate I. Uwasomba appeals the district court’s order
denying reconsideration of its order denying her Federal Rule of
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order.
Uwasomba v. Jett, 3:12-cv-00213-HEW (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2012).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?