Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998972488-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999050346]. Mailed to: Switzer. [12-2274]

Appeal: 12-2274

Doc: 17

Filed: 02/25/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2274

THOMAS L. SWITZER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
TOWN OF STANLEY; DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor; OFFICER BROWN; MARK
BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff;
DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW)

Submitted:

February 21, 2013

Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.

DAVIS,

Circuit

Decided: February 25, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor,
TAYLOR ZUNKER MILNOR & CARTER LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia,

Appeal: 12-2274

Doc: 17

Filed: 02/25/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-2274

Doc: 17

Filed: 02/25/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying
various post-judgment motions.
find

no

for

the

Dean,

No.

5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012).

We

deny Switzer’s motion for transcripts at Government expense.

We

reasons

dispense

reversible
stated

with

contentions

are

by

error.

We have reviewed the record and

the

oral

Accordingly,

district

argument

adequately

court.

because

presented

in

we

affirm

Switzer v.

the
the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3