Earles M. Craddock v. Keith White
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999028847]. Mailed to: Earles M. Craddock. [12-2283]
Appeal: 12-2283
Doc: 6
Filed: 01/24/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2283
EARLES M. CRADDOCK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITE, Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK)
Submitted:
January 22, 2013
Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-2283
Doc: 6
Filed: 01/24/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
dismissing Craddock’s civil action.
and find no reversible error.
the
magistrate
judge
and
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Craddock v. White, No.
1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 2012).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?