Earles M. Craddock v. Keith White

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999028847]. Mailed to: Earles M. Craddock. [12-2283]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2283 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2283 EARLES M. CRADDOCK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KEITH WHITE, Attorney, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-2283 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of dismissing Craddock’s civil action. and find no reversible error. the magistrate judge and We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. White, No. 1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?