Randolph Koch v. Montgomery County Court

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01888-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999050364]. Mailed to: Koch. [12-2292]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2292 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2292 RANDOLPH S. KOCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-01888-JFM) Submitted: February 21, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Circuit Decided: February 25, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph S. Koch, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-2292 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Randolph dismissal of reconsider. error. S. his Koch civil appeals action and the denial district of his court’s motion to We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?