Randolph Koch v. Montgomery County Court
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01888-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999050364]. Mailed to: Koch. [12-2292]
Appeal: 12-2292
Doc: 21
Filed: 02/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2292
RANDOLPH S. KOCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL
APPEALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01888-JFM)
Submitted:
February 21, 2013
Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Circuit
Decided: February 25, 2013
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph S. Koch, Appellant Pro Se.
Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-2292
Doc: 21
Filed: 02/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Randolph
dismissal
of
reconsider.
error.
S.
his
Koch
civil
appeals
action
and
the
denial
district
of
his
court’s
motion
to
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis,
we
affirm
the
district
court’s
orders.
Koch
v.
Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2,
2012; Sept. 21, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?