Marge Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999053225]. Mailed to: Marge Iannucci. [12-2332]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2332 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2332 MARGE IANNUCCI, Plaintiff – Appellant, and MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH) Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 12-2332 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 12-2332 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Marge entering Iannucci judgment in appeals her the employment district court’s discrimination order action in accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and dismissing matter the remainder jurisdiction. discovery and of She entering the also a action for lack appeals the order confidentiality affirm for the reasons stated by the subject compelling order. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we of We have Accordingly, district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?