Marge Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999053225]. Mailed to: Marge Iannucci. [12-2332]
Appeal: 12-2332
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/28/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2332
MARGE IANNUCCI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI,
Plaintiff,
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, et al,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH)
Submitted:
February 26, 2013
Decided:
February 28, 2013
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC,
Atlanta, Georgia; Michael
Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Appeal: 12-2332
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/28/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-2332
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/28/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marge
entering
Iannucci
judgment
in
appeals
her
the
employment
district
court’s
discrimination
order
action
in
accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and
dismissing
matter
the
remainder
jurisdiction.
discovery
and
of
She
entering
the
also
a
action
for
lack
appeals
the
order
confidentiality
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
subject
compelling
order.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
of
We
have
Accordingly,
district
court.
Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.
July
24
&
Oct.
19,
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?