In re: Dennis Miller

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998972118-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998972115-2] Originating case number: 4:09-cr-01272-RBH-8,4:11-cv-03376-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998990138]. Mailed to: Miller. [12-2356]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2356 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/28/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2356 In Re: DENNIS MILLER, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-01272-RBH-8; 4:11-cv-03376-RBH) Submitted: November 14, 2012 Decided: November 28, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Miller, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-2356 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/28/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dennis alleging that Miller the petitions district for court a has writ of unduly mandamus, delayed in scheduling a resentencing hearing following its grant of relief under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West Supp. 2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?