In re: Dennis Miller
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998972118-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998972115-2] Originating case number: 4:09-cr-01272-RBH-8,4:11-cv-03376-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998990138]. Mailed to: Miller. [12-2356]
Appeal: 12-2356
Doc: 6
Filed: 11/28/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2356
In Re:
DENNIS MILLER,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(4:09-cr-01272-RBH-8; 4:11-cv-03376-RBH)
Submitted:
November 14, 2012
Decided:
November 28, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-2356
Doc: 6
Filed: 11/28/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis
alleging
that
Miller
the
petitions
district
for
court
a
has
writ
of
unduly
mandamus,
delayed
in
scheduling a resentencing hearing following its grant of relief
under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West Supp. 2012).
He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act.
We find
the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and deny the mandamus petition.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?