Major Fortson v. Benico H. Gonzale

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998989169-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-00404-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999076739]. Mailed to: Major Fortson, Benico H. Gonzales, Fanny A. Gonzales. [12-2372]

Appeal: 12-2372

Doc: 11

Filed: 04/01/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2372

MAJOR FORTSON, a/k/a Major Lee Fortson,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BENICO H. GONZALES; FANNY A. GONZALES,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
RANDY A. SKINNER,
Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-00404-TMC)

Submitted:

March 28, 2013

Decided:

April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Major Fortson, Appellant Pro Se.
Gonzales, Appellees Pro Se.

Benico H. Gonzales, Fanny A.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-2372

Doc: 11

Filed: 04/01/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Major

Fortson

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Fortson’s
motion

for

judgment

and

to

dismiss

his

appeal

from

bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

the

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for

the

reasons

Gonzales,

No.

dispense

with

contentions

stated

by

the

district

8:12-cv-00404-TMC

are

oral

argument

adequately

(D.S.C.
because

presented

in

court.
Oct. 23,

the
the

facts

Fortson
2012).

v.
We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2