Arnold Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemour

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00711-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999074220]. Mailed to: A. Clarke. [12-2403]

Appeal: 12-2403

Doc: 5

Filed: 03/28/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2403

ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG)

Submitted:

March 26, 2013

Decided:

March 28, 2013

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. *

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*

This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Appeal: 12-2403

Doc: 5

Filed: 03/28/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

Benson

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Arnold
orders

denying

claims

of

breach

conspiracy,
(2006).
error.
district

his

and

complaint
of

and

contract,

racial

the

amended
patent

discrimination

district
complaint

court’s
alleging

infringement,

under

42

fraud,

U.S.C.

§ 1981

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.

3:12-cv-00711-JAG
dispense

Clarke

with

contentions

are

Clarke
(E.D.

oral

Va.

v.

Oct.

argument

adequately

E.I.

Dupont
&

22

DeNemours,
6,

2012).

facts

and

legal

materials

before

because

presented

in

Nov.
the
the

No.
We

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2