Arnold Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemour

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00711-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999074220]. Mailed to: A. Clarke. [12-2403]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2403 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/28/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2403 ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Appeal: 12-2403 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/28/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 Benson appeals PER CURIAM: Arnold orders denying claims of breach conspiracy, (2006). error. district his and complaint of and contract, racial the amended patent discrimination district complaint court’s alleging infringement, under 42 fraud, U.S.C. § 1981 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. 3:12-cv-00711-JAG dispense Clarke with contentions are Clarke (E.D. oral Va. v. Oct. argument adequately E.I. Dupont & 22 DeNemours, 6, 2012). facts and legal materials before because presented in Nov. the the No. We this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?