Jeff Corr v. Bureau of the Public Debt
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal [999017008-2]; denying Motion to stay briefing schedule [999016966-2] Originating case number: 6:11-cv-00865 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999100038]. Mailed to: Jeff Corr. [12-2438]
Appeal: 12-2438
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/02/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2438
JEFF CORR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT, US Department of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (6:11-cv-00865)
Submitted:
April 26, 2013
Decided:
May 2, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeff Corr, Appellant Pro Se.
J. Christopher Krivonyak,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-2438
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/02/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jeff Corr appeals the district court’s order accepting
in
part
and
magistrate
motion
for
summary
rejecting
judge,
granting
summary
judgment.
in
part
the
judgment,
We
deny
the
recommendation
Bureau
and
the
of
denying
Bureau
of
the
Public
Corr’s
the
of
Debt’s
motion
Public
the
for
Debt’s
motions to stay the briefing schedule and dismiss the appeal.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Corr
v.
Bureau
of
the
(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 2012).
Pub.
Debt,
No.
6:11-cv-00865
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?