Jeff Corr v. Bureau of the Public Debt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal [999017008-2]; denying Motion to stay briefing schedule [999016966-2] Originating case number: 6:11-cv-00865 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999100038]. Mailed to: Jeff Corr. [12-2438]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-2438 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/02/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2438 JEFF CORR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT, US Department of the Treasury, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (6:11-cv-00865) Submitted: April 26, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeff Corr, Appellant Pro Se. J. Christopher Krivonyak, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-2438 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/02/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jeff Corr appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and magistrate motion for summary rejecting judge, granting summary judgment. in part the judgment, We deny the recommendation Bureau and the of denying Bureau of the Public Corr’s the of Debt’s motion Public the for Debt’s motions to stay the briefing schedule and dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corr v. Bureau of the (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 2012). Pub. Debt, No. 6:11-cv-00865 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?