Norma Brown Griffin v. Rocco Fucillo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999018789-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal [999046493-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-04223 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999123107].. [12-2576]
Appeal: 12-2576
Doc: 25
Filed: 06/05/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2576
NORMA BROWN GRIFFIN; UNDER SEAL; UNDER SEAL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ROCCO SAMUEL FUCILLO, Commissioner, West Virginia Department
of Health and Human Services; DOUGLAS M. ROBINSON, Deputy
Commissioner, WV DHHR; SUE HAGE, Deputy Commissioner, WV
DHHR; RONALD M. ANDERSON, Deputy Commissioner, WV DHHR; JANE
MCCALLISTER, Director of Child Protective Services; JOE W.
BULLINGTON, Region IV Director, WV DHHR; RUSS FRIDLEY,
Supervisor, CPS Worker, Greebrier County; JEFF POMEROY,
Supervisor, CPS Greenbrier County; MARY TREECE, CPS Worker,
Greenbrier County; RICH HULMES, CPS Worker, Greenbrier
County; DAVINA AGEE, CPS Worker, Greenbrier County; NANCY
EXLINE, Deputy Commissioner, WV DHHR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:12-cv-04223)
Submitted:
May 13, 2013
Decided:
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
June 5, 2013
Appeal: 12-2576
Doc: 25
Filed: 06/05/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Norma Brown Griffin, UNDER SEAL, UNDER SEAL, Appellants Pro Se.
Charlene Ann Vaughan, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-2576
Doc: 25
Filed: 06/05/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Norma Brown Griffin, UNDER SEAL, and UNDER SEAL appeal
the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing
Griffin’s
motion
for
injunctive relief for failure to state a claim on which relief
may
be
granted.
reversible error.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by
the
district
(S.D.W.
Va.
court.
Nov.
20,
Griffin
2012;
v.
Nov.
Fucillo,
28,
No.
2012).
5:12-cv-04223
We
deny
the
Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?