Alice Deane v. Marshalls, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00135-MFU-BWC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999091431]. Mailed to: appellant. [12-2577]

Appeal: 12-2577

Doc: 13

Filed: 04/22/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2577

ALICE M. DEANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARSHALLS, INC.; AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00135-MFU-BWC)

Submitted:

April 18, 2013

Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alice M. Deane, Appellant Pro Se.
Lawrence Philip Postol,
SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Charles Garrison Meyer,
III, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-2577

Doc: 13

Filed: 04/22/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alice

M.

Deane

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

adopting the report of the magistrate judge and dismissing her
employment

discrimination

administrative remedies.

suit

for

failure

the

exhaust

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

to

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Deane does not challenge in her informal brief

basis

for

the

district

court’s

disposition,

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.

she

has

Accordingly,

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2