Laurel Run Mining Company v. Patricia Maynard
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 11-0817 BLA,12-0032 BLA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999378164].. [12-2581]
Appeal: 12-2581
Doc: 59
Filed: 06/18/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2581
LAUREL RUN MINING COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
PATRICIA
ANN
MAYNARD;
DIRECTOR,
OFFICE
OF
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(11-0817 BLA; 12-0032 BLA)
Submitted:
May 30, 2014
Decided:
June 18, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ashley M. Harman, Tiffany B. Davis, JACKSON KELLY PLLC,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner.
Leonard J. Stayton,
Inez, Kentucky; M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen
Frank James, Associate Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, Jeffrey S.
Goldberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-2581
Doc: 59
Filed: 06/18/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Laurel Run Mining Company petitions for review of the
Benefits
Review
Board’s
decision
and
order
affirming
the
administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant
to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012).
Our review of the parties’
briefs
discloses
and
decision
is
the
record
based
reversible error.
upon
on
appeal
substantial
evidence
that
the
Board’s
is
without
and
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
for the reasons stated by the Board.
Laurel Run Mining Co. v.
Maynard, Nos. 11-0817 BLA; 12-0032 BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 31, 2012).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?