Douglas Hall v. Linda Mitchell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998767953-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998762574-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-03173-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998824452]. Mailed to: Douglas Hall. [12-6016]

Appeal: 12-6016

Document: 20

Date Filed: 04/03/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6016

DOUGLAS HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LINDA MITCHELL,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DAVID TAYLOR, in
SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

his

official

capacity;

UNION

COUNTY

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-03173-GRA)

Submitted:

March 29, 2012

Decided:

April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6016

Document: 20

Date Filed: 04/03/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Douglas

Hall

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his civil rights complaint.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Hall v. Mitchell, No.

1:10-cv-03173-GRA (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 2011).

We deny Hall’s pending

motions

to

appoint

counsel.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2