US v. Jorge Petter

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court. [998844238]. Mailed to: Jorge Petter. [12-6033]

Appeal: 12-6033

Document: 5

Date Filed: 05/01/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE PETTER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted:

April 26, 2012

Decided:

May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorge Petter, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6033

Document: 5

Date Filed: 05/01/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jorge
denying

his

Petter

motion

Crim. P. 36.

for

appeals

the

correction

of

district

court’s

judgment

under

order

Fed.

R.

Because we conclude that there were no clerical

errors, we affirm.

See United States v. Buendia-Rangel, 553

F.3d

Cir.

378,

379

(5th

2008)

(affirming

denial

of

Rule

36

motion where judgment lacked indicia of mistake or oversight,
but rather reflected deliberate use of terminology employed).
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2