Marqueion Harrison v. Willie Davi
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [998862160-2], denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [998862163-2], denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [998868467-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998798421-2] Originating case number: 5:10-hc-02235-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998873065]. Mailed to: Marqueion Harrison. [12-6086]
Appeal: 12-6086
Doc: 26
Filed: 06/12/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6086
MARQUEION JAMAL HARRISON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WILLIE DAVIS,
Respondent Appellee,
and
HALIFAX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:10-hc-02235-FL)
Submitted:
May 24, 2012
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
June 12, 2012
HAMILTON,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marqueion
Assistant
Appellee.
Harrison,
Attorney
Appellant Pro Se.
General, Raleigh,
Mary Carla Hollis,
North Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6086
Doc: 26
Filed: 06/12/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marqueion Jamal Harrison seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
petition.
(2006)
The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006).
issue
§ 2254
absent
“a
A certificate of appealability will not
substantial
constitutional right.”
See 28 U.S.C.
showing
of
the
denial
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006).
of
a
When the
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
this
standard
by
demonstrating
that
reasonable
jurists
would
find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
claims is debatable or wrong.
484 (2000);
(2003).
see
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38
When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack,
529 U.S. at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Harrison has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly,
we deny his motion for appointment of counsel, motion for bail
or release pending appeal, and supplemental motion for bail or
release pending appeal, deny a certificate of appealability, and
dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the
2
Appeal: 12-6086
facts
Doc: 26
and
materials
legal
before
Filed: 06/12/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?