US v. Howell Woltz

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed under CJA [998779398-2]; granting Motion [998779398-3] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998869323]. Mailed to: Howell Woltz. [12-6111]

Appeal: 12-6111

Doc: 10

Filed: 06/06/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOWELL W. WOLTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1)

Submitted:

May 31, 2012

Decided:

June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.
Matthew Theodore Martens,
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Washington,
D.C., Kurt William Meyers, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6111

Doc: 10

Filed: 06/06/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Howell

W.

Woltz

appeals

the

district

court’s

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

order

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant Woltz leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis,
court.

we

affirm

for

See

United

States

(W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2012).

the

reasons

v.

Woltz,

stated
No.

by

the

district

3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2