Marvin Moody v. Todd Perseghin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998869438]. Mailed to: Marvin Moody. [12-6133]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6133 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6133 MARVIN J. MOODY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985, Defendant – Appellee, and CAITLIN R. KELLEY, CLARENCE N. JENKINS, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA) Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin J. Moody, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6133 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Marvin J. Moody seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of Defendant Caitlin R. Kelley from this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 545-46 (1949). Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, The order Moody seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as it disposes of fewer than all the parties involved in this lawsuit. Accordingly, because this matter remains pending against Defendant Todd B. Perseghin, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?