Marvin Moody v. Todd Perseghin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998869438]. Mailed to: Marvin Moody. [12-6133]
Appeal: 12-6133
Doc: 10
Filed: 06/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6133
MARVIN J. MOODY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CAITLIN
R.
KELLEY,
CLARENCE N. JENKINS,
Assistant
Commonwealth
Attorney;
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA)
Submitted:
May 18, 2012
Decided:
June 6, 2012
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin J. Moody, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6133
Doc: 10
Filed: 06/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Marvin J. Moody seeks to appeal the district court’s
order
denying
his
motion
to
reconsider
the
dismissal
of
Defendant Caitlin R. Kelley from this action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
Beneficial
Indus.
Loan
Corp.,
337
U.S.
541,
The order Moody seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order,
as it disposes of fewer than all the parties involved in this
lawsuit.
Accordingly,
because
this
matter
remains
pending
against Defendant Todd B. Perseghin, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?