US v. Gideon Beatty, IV

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998824737-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998838861-2]. Originating case number: 1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JES-5. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998923864]. Mailed to: Gideon Beatty, IV. [12-6195]

Appeal: 12-6195

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/24/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GIDEON R. BEATTY, IV, a/k/a Bert, a/k/a Kev,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JES-5)

Submitted:

August 22, 2012

Decided: August 24, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gideon R. Beatty, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley,
Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6195

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/24/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gideon
order

granting

R.
a

§ 3582(c) (2006).
of discretion.

Beatty,
sentence

IV,

appeals

district

pursuant

reduction

the

to

court’s

18

U.S.C.

We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186

(4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard).
Beaty’s

motion

for

dispense

with

oral

appointment
argument

of

Accordingly, we affirm.
counsel

because

the

is

denied.

facts

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2