Chris Schowerth v. John Ingram

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-ct-03054-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998840917]. Mailed to: Chris Schowerth. [12-6221]

Appeal: 12-6221

Document: 14

Date Filed: 04/26/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6221

CHRIS SCHOWERTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN
INGRAM,
Sheriff;
PHIL
PARRY,
Captain;
JANE
EVENS,
Lieutenant; JAMES STEWERD, Sargent; SHANE GUNNELL, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03054-BO)

Submitted:

April 19, 2012

Decided:

April 26, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chris Schowerth, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6221

Document: 14

Date Filed: 04/26/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Chris

Schowerth

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Schowerth v. Ingram, No. 5:10-ct-03054-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan.

court.

27, 2012).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2