US v. Harlando Carr

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998788472-2] Originating case number: 5:96-cr-00020-H-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998830283].. [12-6242]

Appeal: 12-6242

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/11/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HARLANDO OMAR CARR,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00020-H-1)

Submitted:

April 2, 2012

Decided:

April 11, 2012

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Gridley Pruden, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Jennifer P. MayParker,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6242

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/11/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Harlando Omar Carr appeals the district court’s order
denying

his

motion

for

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).
reversible error.
order.
Cir.

a

under

18

U.S.C.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

See United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 728-29 (4th
2000);

counsel.

before

reduction

We have reviewed the record and find no

United

States

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2012).

legal

sentence

v.

Carr,

No.

5:96-cr-00020-H-1

We deny the motion for appointment of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2