US v. Keith Bryant
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998864800].. [12-6283]
Appeal: 12-6283
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/31/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6283
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH E. BRYANT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3)
Submitted:
May 24, 2012
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 31, 2012
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith E. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6283
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/31/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Keith
denying
his
E.
Bryant
motion
for
appeals
the
appointment
of
district
counsel
court
and
orders
for
DNA
testing under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3600 (2006), and for reconsideration
of these demands.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
United States v. Bryant, No. 1:95-cr-
00202-CCB-3 (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 19, 2012).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?