US v. Keith Bryant

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998864800].. [12-6283]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6283 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6283 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH E. BRYANT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3) Submitted: May 24, 2012 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 31, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6283 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Keith denying his E. Bryant motion for appeals the appointment of district counsel court and orders for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3600 (2006), and for reconsideration of these demands. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No. 1:95-cr- 00202-CCB-3 (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?