Shaheen Cabbagestalk v. Sergeant Terry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to enforce [998817278-2]; denying Motion to impose sanctions [998812864-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00508-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998900055]. Mailed to: Shaheen Cabbagestalk. [12-6336]
Appeal: 12-6336
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/23/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6336
SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT S. TERRY; SERGEANT COTTER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GWEN T. HYATT; DHO MS. GLIDEWELL; ASSOCIATE WARDEN MR.
LEWIS; IGC MS. CULBREATH; IGC MS. HOLMES; MAJOR FRANK
MUSIER; MR. J. MICHAEL BAXLEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE;
JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; GENERAL COUNSEL OF SCDC; IGC,
at Perry Corrections; CORPORAL YARBOUGHT, of property
control at McCormick Prison, in their individual and
official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(3:11-cv-00508-TMC)
Submitted:
July 19, 2012
Decided:
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
July 23, 2012
Appeal: 12-6336
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/23/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
Shaheen Cabbagestalk, Appellant Pro Se.
Alissa Robyn Collins,
James Albert Stuckey, Jr., STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-6336
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/23/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Shaheen
Cabbagestalk
appeals
the
district
court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Feb.
13,
Cabbagestalk
2012).
We
v.
No.
Terry,
deny
3:11-cv-00508-TMC
Cabbagestalk’s
motions
(D.S.C.
to
impose
sanctions and to enforce separation and restraining order.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?