Shaheen Cabbagestalk v. Sergeant Terry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to enforce [998817278-2]; denying Motion to impose sanctions [998812864-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00508-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998900055]. Mailed to: Shaheen Cabbagestalk. [12-6336]

Appeal: 12-6336

Doc: 24

Filed: 07/23/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6336

SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT S. TERRY; SERGEANT COTTER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GWEN T. HYATT; DHO MS. GLIDEWELL; ASSOCIATE WARDEN MR.
LEWIS; IGC MS. CULBREATH; IGC MS. HOLMES; MAJOR FRANK
MUSIER; MR. J. MICHAEL BAXLEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE;
JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; GENERAL COUNSEL OF SCDC; IGC,
at Perry Corrections; CORPORAL YARBOUGHT, of property
control at McCormick Prison, in their individual and
official capacity,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(3:11-cv-00508-TMC)

Submitted:

July 19, 2012

Decided:

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

July 23, 2012

Appeal: 12-6336

Doc: 24

Filed: 07/23/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Shaheen Cabbagestalk, Appellant Pro Se.
Alissa Robyn Collins,
James Albert Stuckey, Jr., STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-6336

Doc: 24

Filed: 07/23/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Shaheen

Cabbagestalk

appeals

the

district

court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Feb.

13,

Cabbagestalk
2012).

We

v.

No.

Terry,

deny

3:11-cv-00508-TMC

Cabbagestalk’s

motions

(D.S.C.

to

impose

sanctions and to enforce separation and restraining order.
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3