US v. Robert Lassiter, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:01-cr-00180-RAJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998878077]. Mailed to: Robert Lassiter, III. [12-6355]

Appeal: 12-6355

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/19/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6355

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT LEE LASSITER, III,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:01-cr-00180-RAJ-1)

Submitted:

June 14, 2012

Decided: June 19, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Lassiter, III,
Tayman,
Assistant
United
Virginia, for Appellee.

Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro
States
Attorney,
Newport
News,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6355

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/19/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Lassiter, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States

v.

Lassiter,

No.

2:01-cr-00180-RAJ-1

Feb. 3, & entered Feb. 6, 2012).

(E.D.

United

Va.

filed

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2