Melvin Hill v. Postal Service

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998812799-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00525-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998893462]. Mailed to: Melvin Hill. [12-6377]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6377 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/12/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6377 MELVIN HILL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00525-JFM) Submitted: June 28, 2012 Decided: July 12, 2012 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6377 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/12/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Melvin Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to pay the filing fees. If a litigant has had three actions or appeals the dismissed on ground that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the litigant may not proceed without prepayment of fees unless the applicant physical injury.” is under “imminent danger 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2006). of serious Hill has had three such prior dismissals: Hill v. Hughes, 1:00-cv-3204 (D. Md. 2000), Hill v. Woods, 1:96-cv-3034 (D. Md. 1996), Hill v. Harvey, 1:96-cv-3886 (D. Md. 1996). Hill has not alleged that he serious is under imminent danger of physical injury. Therefore, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?