Anthony White v. David Hoyle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00117-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998907826]. Mailed to: Anthony White. [12-6432]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6432 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/02/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6432 ANTHONY LEO WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID HOYLE, N.C. Department of Revenue Secretary; CALE JOHNSON, Supervisor N.C. DOR Unauthorized Substances Tax Division; DAVID WARLICK, Agent N.C. DOR Unauthorized Substances Tax Division; DONNIE DELLINGER, Burke Co. Narcotics Task Force Investigator; RICK HASSON, Sgt. Burke County Narcotics Task Force, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00117-RJC) Submitted: July 24, 2012 Decided: August 2, 2012 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Leo White, Appellant Pro Se. David Dalton Lennon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6432 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/02/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Leo White appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. See White (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012). v. Hoyle, No. 1:11-cv-00117-RJC We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?