Anthony White v. David Hoyle
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00117-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998907826]. Mailed to: Anthony White. [12-6432]
Appeal: 12-6432
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/02/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6432
ANTHONY LEO WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID HOYLE, N.C. Department of Revenue Secretary; CALE
JOHNSON, Supervisor N.C. DOR Unauthorized Substances Tax
Division; DAVID WARLICK, Agent N.C. DOR Unauthorized
Substances Tax Division; DONNIE DELLINGER, Burke Co.
Narcotics Task Force Investigator; RICK HASSON, Sgt. Burke
County Narcotics Task Force,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00117-RJC)
Submitted:
July 24, 2012
Decided:
August 2, 2012
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leo White, Appellant Pro Se.
David Dalton Lennon,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE,
PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6432
Doc: 19
Filed: 08/02/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leo White appeals the district court’s order
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
district
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.
See
White
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012).
v.
Hoyle,
No.
1:11-cv-00117-RJC
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?