Robert Drayton v. Levern Cohen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998831378-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cv-03171-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998909816]. Mailed to: Robert Selest Drayton. [12-6463]
Appeal: 12-6463
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6463
ROBERT SELEST DRAYTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, Ridgeland Correctional Institution; LT.
JOSEPH POWELL; NURSE K. KAY, LPN; LIEUTENANT D. LLOYD;
SERGEANT J. PERRY; MRS. CONNELLY, Medical Supervisor Lieber
Corr.; NURSE JENNIFER SCOTT, LPN; WARDEN WAYNE MCCABE,
Lieber Correctional Inst; MR. SERGEANT SIMMONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(2:10-cv-03171-TMC)
Submitted:
July 24, 2012
Decided:
August 6, 2012
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Selest Drayton, Appellant Pro Se.
Christy L. Scott,
SCOTT & PAYNE LAW FIRM, Walterboro, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6463
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
Selest
Drayton
appeals
the
district
court’s
order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
denying
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
find
no
reversible
error.
relief
on
Drayton’s
42
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
we
affirm
for
the
reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton’s motion
to appoint appellate counsel.
03171-TMC
(D.S.C.
Feb.
29,
Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?