Robert Drayton v. Levern Cohen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998831378-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cv-03171-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998909816]. Mailed to: Robert Selest Drayton. [12-6463]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6463 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6463 ROBERT SELEST DRAYTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, Ridgeland Correctional Institution; LT. JOSEPH POWELL; NURSE K. KAY, LPN; LIEUTENANT D. LLOYD; SERGEANT J. PERRY; MRS. CONNELLY, Medical Supervisor Lieber Corr.; NURSE JENNIFER SCOTT, LPN; WARDEN WAYNE MCCABE, Lieber Correctional Inst; MR. SERGEANT SIMMONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:10-cv-03171-TMC) Submitted: July 24, 2012 Decided: August 6, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Selest Drayton, Appellant Pro Se. Christy L. Scott, SCOTT & PAYNE LAW FIRM, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6463 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Selest Drayton appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. find no reversible error. relief on Drayton’s 42 We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Drayton’s motion to appoint appellate counsel. 03171-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 29, Drayton v. Cohen, No. 2:10-cv2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?