Mauricio Weber v. Melissa Aiken-Partain

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998817144-2]. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-02423-GRA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998882941]. Mailed to: Mauricio Weber. [12-6468]

Appeal: 12-6468

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6468

MAURICIO E. WEBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. MELISSA AIKEN-PARTAIN; DETECTIVE MIKE AIKEN; OFFICER
MICHAEL ROBERSON; SGT. KEITH BAGWELL; OFFICER TREVOR
SIMMONS; RETENTION OFFICER JOEY CHAPMAN; LIEUTENANT JOHN
ZAMBERLIN; INVESTIGATOR MIKE BASKINS; SOLICITOR CHRISSY J.
ADAMS; ASSISTANT SOLICITOR KRISTIN REEVES; PUBLIC DEFENDER
ROBERT A. GAMBLE; ATTORNEY JOY CHAVIS; CLERK OF COURT
RICHARD A. SHIRLEY; CLERK OF COURT DANIEL E. SHEAROUSE;
SECURITY OFFICER JOHN DOE; SECURITY OFFICER JOHN TWO DOE;
DIRECTOR JEFFERY MUSICK, Forensic Evaluation Service; DOCTOR
RICHARD L. FRIERSON; SOCIAL WORKER DORIS A. TAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:11-cv-02423-GRA)

Submitted:

June 21, 2012

Decided:

June 26, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6468

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order
accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate

judge

and

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Weber v. Aiken-Partain, No. 8:11-cv-02423-GRA (D.S.C.

Feb. 15, 2012).
dispense

with

We deny Weber’s motion to appoint counsel.
oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2