US v. Tiayon Kardell Evan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998883115]. Mailed to: Tiayon Kardell Evans. [12-6476]

Appeal: 12-6476

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIAYON KARDELL EVANS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1)

Submitted:

June 21, 2012

Decided:

June 26, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tiayon Kardell Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Sherrie Scott
Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6476

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

Kardell

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Tiayon
order

denying

a

Evans

reduction

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).

in

his

the

sentence

district
under

court’s

18

U.S.C.

On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Evans’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Evans has forfeited appellate
review
district

of

the

court’s

court’s

order.

judgment.

Accordingly,

We

dispense

with

we

affirm

oral

the

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2