Kenneth Mason v. Wexford Health Source
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998854281-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal [998842213-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975560]. Mailed to: Kenneth Mason. [12-6479]
Appeal: 12-6479
Doc: 18
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6479
KENNETH MASON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES; ADRIAN HOKE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TRISTEN TENNEY, Med. Adm.; NURSES JANE DOE 1 THROUGH 8,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ)
Submitted:
September 20, 2012
Decided:
November 6, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Mason, Appellant Pro Se.
Philip Cameron Petty, ROSE
PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia; Thomas E. Buck,
BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6479
Doc: 18
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
Mason
the
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth
accepting
dismissing
the
his
appeals
recommendations
42
U.S.C.
of
§ 1983
district
the
court’s
magistrate
(2006)
judge
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
orders
and
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Mason
v. Wexford Health Sources, No. 2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ (N.D. W.
Va. Jan. 11, 2011; Jan. 20, 2012; Jan. 26, 2012).
We deny
appellee Hoke’s motion to dismiss and deny Mason’s motion for
appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?