Kenneth Mason v. Wexford Health Source

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998854281-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal [998842213-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975560]. Mailed to: Kenneth Mason. [12-6479]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6479 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6479 KENNETH MASON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES; ADRIAN HOKE, Warden, Defendants - Appellees, and TRISTEN TENNEY, Med. Adm.; NURSES JANE DOE 1 THROUGH 8, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ) Submitted: September 20, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia; Thomas E. Buck, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6479 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 Mason the PER CURIAM: Kenneth accepting dismissing the his appeals recommendations 42 U.S.C. of § 1983 district the court’s magistrate (2006) judge complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. orders and We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mason v. Wexford Health Sources, No. 2:10-cv-00055-JPB-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 11, 2011; Jan. 20, 2012; Jan. 26, 2012). We deny appellee Hoke’s motion to dismiss and deny Mason’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?