Richard Sisson v. Fred Davi
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00313-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998917210]. Mailed to: Richard Sisson. [12-6496]
Appeal: 12-6496
Doc: 16
Filed: 08/16/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6496
RICHARD SISSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRED DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center; ROSANNE
CONNER, RN, Deerfield Correctional Center; K. FAISON,
Medical
Staff,
Deerfield
Correctional
Center;
FRED
SCHILLING, Health Services Director - VDOC; BENITA BADGETTE,
Healthcare Adm., Deerfield Correctional Center; GARY BASS,
Chief of Operations-VDOC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00313-LMB-TCB)
Submitted:
July 19, 2012
Decided:
August 16, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Sisson, Appellant Pro Se.
Christopher Davies Supino,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6496
Doc: 16
Filed: 08/16/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Richard
denying
relief
Sisson
on
his
appeals
42
U.S.C.
the
district
§ 1983
(2006)
court’s
orders
complaint
and
denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or
amend.
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district
(E.D.
Va.
have
reviewed
court.
Feb.
Sisson
2
&
Mar.
the
v.
2,
record
Davis,
2012).
and
No.
We
find
no
reversible
1:11-cv-00313-LMB-TCB
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?